Menu
A collaborative prediction of what is expected to take place at the first presidential debate of 2016 details both candidate’s strengths and weaknesses. Written by Patrick Healey, Amy Chozik, and Maggie Herbman, their journalistic factoid published in The New York Times just three days before the debate is a descriptive, dedicated piece justifying this year’s presidential race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Titled, Debate Prep? Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Differ on That, Too, all three authors are held responsible for the information provided. The structure of this piece is quite informative and well presented. There are detailed facts about both candidates, as well as a prediction of what each candidate will speak about and what responses they will have for one another. What makes this article unique and unlike any other published work about this year’s upcoming Presidential Debate, is the segmented descriptions of each candidate's strengths, weaknesses, strategies, preparations, and vulnerabilities. Healey claims that some of Trump’s weaknesses are lashing back and criticizing Clinton for what she will say. However, Healey recognizes Trump’s professional skills such as a successful businessman, and that his domestic economic policies are far greater and could benefit the American people more than Clinton’s. This article has several different sources, coming from a wide variety of different backgrounds with several different opinions. Under each category, strategies for example, Trump and Clinton’s tactics are dissected and explained in thorough detail. This not only provides valuable insight for the reader but also political background knowledge for someone who isn’t as familiar to the politics of this campaign. What is similar between this article and some of my prior work is the factual evidence and details about each candidate. This legitimizes the strength and actuality of the story to a level of efficient comprehension for all readers, both politically-smart and not politically-correct. The in depth details remind me of a prior assignment I published about a statistical work of Elon’s baseball program. Through the various personnel I interviewed as well as factual research on the projections of the team’s success for the upcoming season, the facts and stats helped structure and mold my story to become believable and understandable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |
Proudly powered by Weebly